This is gonna take a while, but two pictures this time!!!

This is the article I commented on, obviously i went a bit overboard, just bear with me I believe I've made a solid rebuttal.

Lets go ahead and take this paragraph by paragraph. 

Romney turn to music after the elections

"In the past 4 1/2 years that the United States has been transformed into one of the most corrupted nation ever...". Ever. Most corrupted nation ever. France is more corrupt than the United States. Saying that the United States is the "most corrupted nation ever" is putting us in the same ballpark as Mongolia, Somalia, and North Korea. I have no idea where you got your numbers or if you are just to busy watching Fox news to tell you your next set of impertinent states such as "Most corrupt nation ever". The Bush administration had 30 political scandals, one which was called Laywergate, which shares a related name to President Nixon's scandal, Watergate, that led to his impeachment.

Its not called "Obamacare" its called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or more commonly the Affordable Care Act, also President Obama hasn't been "promoting" PPACA for four and a half years. PPACA was introduced in the House of Representatives as the "Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009" by Charles Rangel (D-NY). The "inflicted" twenty thousand "pages of incoherent rules, regulations and mandates" is actually only nine hundred and six pages. The act itself was only signed into law on March 23, 2010. So this whole four and a half years of promotion boils down to six months of legislature spanning from September 17, 2009 to its signing in March of the following year. What also irks me is to see that so many people are against the first major overhaul of our decrepit sluggish excuse we call a medical system since 1965. It took forty five years and seven presidents to make a change.

Explain to me like I'm a child how the President of the United States of America "humiliated the US" by not sending anyone to Margret Thatcher's funeral. First off The delegations representing the U.S. at the two funerals were similar, comprising mostly diplomatic personnel and former cabinet members and congressmen rather than current officeholders. The U.S. delegation to Hugo Chávez's funeral included U.S. Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, U.S. Embassy Caracas Chargé d'Affaires James Derham, and former U.S. Rep. William Delahunt of Massachusetts. The U.S. delegation to Margaret Thatcher's funeral included former U.S. Secretaries of State George Shultz and James Baker, U.S. Embassy London Chargé d'Affaires Barbara Stephenson, and U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom Louis Susman. (Three current GOP members of the House of Representatives also attended Thatcher's funeral as part of a Republican delegation. The Presidents choice to send delegation to both funerals is not a disgrace of any kind, its the utmost gesture of respect regardless of the current relationship between the two nations 

How in the world has President Obama "torn and divided our country" to an extent that you compare it to times of the Civil War? He hasn't that's how. How has the President pitted homosexuals and heterosexuals against each other? or men against women? I haven't seen riots, conflicts, or any civilian turmoil inside the United States under this current administration, and to say that there is such problems and not have substantial evidence to back it up it beyond detrimental to your entire article.

Since id rather not go on forever I'm gonna short answer the last three paragraphs. 

The "shovel-ready projects" were apart of the 2009 stimulus bill but some where sidetracked due to government regulations and permitting procedures. Also the Presidents exact words were "Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected" not the "...Obama admitted that there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs.".

The second to last paragraph just states that the President has "unconstitutionally attacked" freedom of religion. Where since the administration has held office have they made any efforts to derail or deny any religious freedoms? the answer to that is none.

 Yet again you speak about the President like he is some tyrannical dictator out to smash any and all "freedoms" and "rights" that were "god-given" by the Found Fathers. The Founding Fathers lived 200 years ago and I honestly doubt they would agree with anything going on with the government, past and present. To bring up something that happened two centuries ago without any cold hard evidence to bring to the table its hard to even take this article serious. Reading this was bad enough and seeing that you were just spewing anti-Obama slander made me beyond worried for my generation if we just blindly speak negativity of our government without a sliver of research 

Its all to keep you "safe"

Getting a grade for ranting!! Huzzah!! 

With all the recent news of countries being called out on spying each other is funny, and sad. As if the UN was a high school auditorium, world leaders are bickering and spreading rumors of others spying on each other. I mean give me a break. Its been a long year of "espionage" and "uncovering" spy rings, with no end in sight. This whole thing started when Snowden, former NSA system administrator, came out with copious amounts classified NSA documents and gave them to the public. He was later charged with "Theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified intelligence to an unauthorized person.". In my opinion they screwed the pooch when they let this scumbag get away. Maybe they honestly messed up or if it was just apart of the long game. Keep him quiet by letting him go? Who knows. All i know is that Edward Snowden is traitor to the United States as a whole for leaking sensitive documents to the public. Now others think differently and want him to be treated like mother Teresa  Showering him in awards and praise for his courageous acts and bravery. Makes me sick. What it boils down to is that he snitched on his own country and deserves to pay. Yes this is a free country, yes its his right to spread the truth, but he went about it the wrong way. He could still be living in the US with his family and friends if he had only been a little more couth in his actions. All he had to do was run it up the ladder to someone who thought the same way he did and have it taken care of like that and the worst the could have happened is that he would have been told to shut up and get a bonus to keep his mouth shut. Well, we all know it didn't happen that way. The thing I cant fathom is why you would ever do something like that. He obviously had high clearance in the NSA, which in itself is a big deal and a rare privilege, but to throw it all away to "uncover" the truth is the most idiotic thing I can think of next to NASA spending millions to create a pen that works upside down in space. It wasn't long ago that a little thing called the Patriot Act was put into action, pretty much giving the government free reign over our information to enable a better chance at protecting us from outside threats. Now im not defending the act because even though its idea is mostly honorable, nothing is perfect. Its just when people like Snowden or Pvt. Bradley Edward Manning, aka Chelsea Elizabeth Manning, it frustrates me to see that these people do such frivolous and detrimental things for little to no achievement or reward. Also that whole "I want to be called Chelsea" thing has go to be the smartest thing next to getting Johnnie Cochran to defend O.J. Simpson. I could go on for days and days about this subject and how ridiculously simpleminded the public is to want to defend and praise these people for, and lets be honest here, telling on the government. Not to mention that the same government they scorn for spying on its people is the same government who they voted in 12 years ago that would go on to create the Patriot Act, that still stands this day without and impediment. So the next time you hear news weather it domestic or foreign on the topic of spying, change the channel, I promise there is something more important on.



**Edit: Brazil admits to spying on US diplomats after blasting NSA surveillance, after weeks of complaining about the NSA spying....